REVOLUTIONS 2!

Following the success of REVOLUTIONS, the speculative fiction anthology produced by the Manchester Speculative Fiction Group, we have decided to produce a sequel, titled (you guessed it) REVOLUTIONS 2!

We want your sci-fi, horror and fantasy stories! Payment rates have also gone up, so see the guidelines below and get submitting!

 

REVOLUTIONS!

 

REVOLUTIONS 2

Call for Submissions:

The theme will be the same as for the first anthology, which is that all stories must be speculative fiction and be linked to Manchester, England in some way.

REVOLUTIONS 2 will be available in e-book and print formats later this year.

Submissions are open to anyone who is aged over 18 from anywhere in the world.

The last date we will accept submissions is: 31st December 2016

Please read ALL of the guidelines BEFORE you submit.

 

GUIDELINES

What We Want

Stories must contain speculative fiction elements. This includes: science fiction, fantasy, horror, slipstream, urban/contemporary fantasy, and dark fantasy.

Stories must be between 1,500 and 6,000 words in length.

All stories must be associated with Manchester or the Greater Manchester area in some meaningful way. For example, a story set aboard an orbiting space station that just happens to be called Manchester in the Alpha Proxima star system will probably be rejected. Having said that, we are flexible on this. The editors all have different tastes in fiction. If in doubt, submit!

Be creative. We want stories that are fresh, smart, entertaining, and emotionally satisfying. We want stories that surprise us, horrify us or offer us a glimpse of something we never imagined. You can be ultra-realistic or far removed from reality. The only thing is that your story must be set in Manchester or its suburbs.

You can find out about Manchester right here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchester

Stories should be attached to an email and sent to: msfantho[at]yahoo.com

In the subject line of your email write: “Submission [STORY TITLE] – [YOUR NAME]”

Please also give us a few lines of biographical information about yourself.

Stories should be in Times New Roman or Courier font, 12 point, double spaced. The following file formats are acceptable: rtf, .doc, .docx

Submissions must be in English.

What We Don’t Want

We do NOT want novels, pictures books, illustrations, non-fiction articles or photographs. We only publish short fiction.

We will NOT publish anything that depicts child abuse or bestiality.

NO multiple submissions. This means you can submit only one story until you receive a decision from us. You may then submit another story and so on.

For a taste of the kind of things we like, it would certainly be an advantage to read the first REVOLUTIONS anthology, available here: http://amzn.to/2aPakpq

Feel free to ask any questions to our self-aware Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/revolutionsanthology

Did we mention it has to have some connection to Manchester?

What We Give You:

REVOLUTIONS 2 is a paying market.

We pay each author that we publish a single payment of £15 Sterling.

What We Ask For:

First Print and Electronic Publishing Rights, exclusive for 12 months. After that, you are free to publish your material elsewhere.

Bear in mind that most publications will not publish pieces that have been published in print, eBooks, or on the web, so for all intents and purposes after your work is published by us it can only be marketed as a reprint, which severely limits the number of markets that will accept it, and drastically reduces the pay rate it can receive. It is up to you to decide if publishing your work in print and eBook formats and on the web, giving up your First Publishing Right for the above token payment, is really what you want to do.

We also reserve the right to place short (1 page or less) excerpts of stories online indefinitely for advertising purposes.

 That’s it!

Tentative publication date early 2017.

We look forward to reading your work!

The Editors.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Meeting – Tuesday 22nd November

Another top meeting on a somewhat drizzly Tuesday night. We had twelve members in attendance and five pieces in the box.

Eric presented the final section of a two-part story called ‘Mr Nobody’. Lots of praise here for the great premise, ambiguity, and the POV’s quirky habits (I’m pretty sure we’ve all wanted to squeeze a few heads on the bus!). Some questions over whether there is enough at stake for our protagonist and just what his motivation is in the last third of the story. Calls for a bit more sympathy for the protagonist and some Patrick Batemen type carnage in the final act.

Mark presented the first part of ‘Adapt or Die 22’, a rags-to-riches story of a retired slasher coming back for one final kill. Members enjoyed the crisp prose, dark humour, and celebrity slasher POV. Some pressing questions: Who is paying him for all of this, and why is it legal!? Some members also wondered whether the back and forth between the memoir and the chase scene slowed the pace a little too much. Calls to keep the POV steady and to turn Marisa’s harrowing chase into a twitter feed!

Kate presented the first part of a quest fantasy novella called ‘Shaman’. Some Comparisons drawn to the South American book, Something of the deer. Members were fully on board with the non-western fantasy setting and gender swapping shamans. Praise for the great world-building, and brilliant twists on the old folk-tale betrothal story. Some questions over whether there is a bit too much information crammed into this first part: should this be the first 3-4 chapters rather than the first 3-4 thousand words? Also, where about is this set, and what is going on in that spirit journey? Calls for a bit more emotion from our POV and her betrothed, more visual descriptions of the world, and to make the details of the spirit journey a little more clear cut.

Javier presented the first part of his horror piece called ‘The Haunting Handbook’. Members enjoyed the Gothic horror styling of this piece (even those who aren’t usually fans of the style!). Praise for the olde English vibe and the slow build horror elements in this piece. Some questions raise around the monster encounter: what does the Barghest actually look like, and why does it just stand there? Also, do we need a preface, a poem and a foreword? Calls for more description of the place (what are the sights, sounds and smells of this gloomy 19th Century York), a little more detail on the Barghest, and, of course: more more more.

Chris presented ‘Itchy throat’, a hairy little body-horror piece you should definitely avoid showing to your mum. We unfortunately had no time for crits in the session, so we went across to Common where all were agreed that it was thoroughly disgusting.

That’s all for this time. Next meeting December 14th.

Pip pip!

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Wednesday Meeting: 9th November

We had a big turnout this week and only got through four of the five pieces.

Also, consider this your bi-monthly reminder that we are accepting submissions for our next Anthology. We have yet to receive any submissions from group members so get scribbling!

Chris:

Chris presented a flash piece called luck of the draw.

  • There were lots of positive comments about the strong philosophical edge in the piece.
  • The group seemed to be split on length. Does it need to be longer or does it work as flash?
  • Some confusion over what the setting was. Some members mistakenly believed it was a casino rather than a luck mine.
  • A few questions over the info-dumpy bit at the end.
  • Had all the usual positives of a strong voice, very readable and slick dialogue.

the-luck-factory

Ezeiyoke:

Ezeiyoke presented the start of a piece called ‘Guardian’.

  • Lots of nice comments about the folkloric some comments over the nice imagery.
  • Some confusion over the language. Large sentences and long paragraphs seemed a bit long and clunky for some.
  • Some comments that the king’s sexual arousal scene came out of nowhere. Others found this to be a nice twist.
  • Some comments that there were too many descriptions of the protag looking towards his wife.

king

Luke

Luke presented the first part of a novelette called ‘All The Things That End’.

  • Lots of comments about the prologue with the verdict edging towards it not being necessary. Can we just start in the stable?
  • Lots of positive comments about the world and believable setting.
  • Some questions over the Western elements. Does it sometimes veer towards Cliché? Differing opinions on this.
  • Some nice comments about the quality of the dialogue.

cowboy

Tom:

Tom presented another chapter from his novel An End To Forever

  • Lots of praise for the quality of writing in this piece. Some top notch world building as usual.
  • The array of different creatures is great fun.
  • Some questions over the amount of characters and the flitting between different worlds. Some comments that only reading a couple of chapters a month means it is hard to keep track of everything.
  • Some call’s for the buildings and the land to be made more vivid. Some found the large wonderful structures difficult to picture.

half-bird-half-human

We all nipped off to the pub afterwards for a few slugs of grog and a chat. Topics of conversation centred around the election across the pond (you know? The one that wasn’t at all in the news?).

Next meeting is Tuesday the 22nd November. See you there!

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Meeting – Tuesday 25th Oct 16

 

img_20161025_201708

Ahoy there!

Another top meeting this Tuesday with five pieces in the box and a whopping seventeen members in attendance (I think the most we’ve ever had!). A very warm welcome to our newest member, Marc, who presented some great first-time crits. We look forward to reading some of your fiction very soon!

Before we get to the meeting, can I drop in a gentle reminder to everyone about donations: MadLab give us the space for free and we try to make sure that we ca give something back to help keep them afloat. We suggest £1 per meeting, though I know some people like to put in a lump sum for a number of meetings. You can find the donate link in the bar to the right.

OK, to the crits!

James presented the first part of a piece called Arthur Leyland. Members enjoyed the shock factor, striking opening, and the very very dark humour. There was lots of praise for the character moments: members felt this nicely captured the conflicted nature of loss and grief. Some questions over Arthur’s reaction at finding his father (check for a pulse, man!). Also, some members wondered whether the flashback/memories should come where they do (given the rather dark hole we are looking into!), and whether we need quite so many of them. Some members were wanting some more sensory writing: there are loads of bodily fluids, but where are the smells? (God help us!) Calls for a closer narrative voice, some more shocks, some more showing, and a little less telling.

– – – I am not putting a picture in for this one! – – –

Claire presented the first part of her children’s story, Gendry the Christmas Elf. Members enjoyed the fairy-tale style in this piece as well as the charming imagery and the mischief of our main character. Praise for the clear prose and fun style. Some questions raised over just how big Gendry is and whether raspberries really would dye a fairy purple. Also, why is the juice so horrid and smelly? Some members felt it would be useful to see how this would look in print with illustrations, this might give a better indication of the pacing. Calls to keep the writing a little more consistently fairy tale esque, to keep the rhythm bouncy, and to add in some more fantasy elements to the world (we want fairy-berries!).

3371238-a-single-raspberry-stands-out-among-blackberries

Eric presented the first part of Mr. Death, a short story about an office worker with a not-so-tender touch. Lots of praise for the unconventional protagonist and his neurotic inner monologues (some members felt this could have been taken further). Some questions over Andre’s motives: why does he go out with the office gang if he doesn’t want to be around people? Perhaps we could play up the social anxiety/pressure angle? Calls for a quickening of the pace, more misanthropy, and more detail on our protagonist (is he deaf? Is he autistic?).

hipster_1

Tom presented the third chapter from his sci-fi epic Children of Akorest. Lots of praise here for the action scenes and descriptions of the characters and port. Lots of intrigue about the jarsens’ ‘pact’, I think all were agreed that this was a great backdrop to the species and a mystery we can’t wait to have solved. Some questions raised over whether we need to meet so many characters in this chapter. Perhaps we could meet some of them later when they’re doing what they do best. Calls for a bit more description of the setting and a slight slowing of the pace. Calls, also, for a slightly closer perspective (we want a look inside that jarsen’s head!).

rlslegacy_treasureplanet

To everyone’s utter dismay, we ran out of time before getting to Chris’s piece. Through the wailing and sobbing and the salty salty tears we agreed to bump the piece to the next meeting.

That’s all for now. Next meeting Wednesday the 9th November. See you there!

Pip Pip!

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Wednesday Meeting: October 12th

We had a big old turnout this week with four pieces to get through. It was a pleasure to welcome Ezeiyoke and Marc to their first meeting. It’s great to see our little (or now not so little) group continue to grow.

Chris Ovenden:

Chris presented the second part of his novel the knight of never rest:

Like the previous chapter, I think everyone really enjoyed this piece. There were lots of positive comments about the setting, and the dialogue was a real pleasure to read. There was a bit of confusion around whether the protagonist already knew the witch or not. Perhaps the author could make this a bit clearer? As with previous chapters, there were some calls for the language to be more uniform. At times the language feels very old world, where at others it felt quite modern.

Everyone is looking forward to the next chapter!

knight-of-never-rest

Hans:

Hans presented the first part of a novel called Boys.

I think everyone enjoyed the narrative here, and there was praise for the interesting ideas on show. Most group members liked the idea of a government death department (although if it was really a department it was perhaps giving away a little too much). Some found the prose a little too cinematic, especially the chase/chess scene. This kind of approach would be great for a film, but it didn’t quite hit the mark here. There were some calls for more visualisation of the surroundings and calls for more characterization.

chess

Tom:

Tom presented the second chapter of a piece called The Fabled Winds.

I think everyone enjoyed the descriptions in this piece. The world building came across as fantastical and sophisticated, while the flora and fauna of the planet showed great creativity on the author’s part. There were some questions over how clear the protagonist’s thought processes were when she was in a life or death situation, and some felt that the injury was a little too serious for her to be moving around as freely as she was. A few members wanted to see a more authentic narrative voice, and there were some comments that piece was a little ‘told’ at times.

Everyone is looking forward to seeing what other wonders await in the next chapter.

alien-landscape

Bryn:

Bryn presented the second part of a short story called An End To Forever

Lots of positive comments for the quality of the prose in this piece. There were some fantastic turns of phrase that really showcased the author’s talents. Some members felt that the story felt like two ideas crunched together. Does the first half fit with the second half? There were a few comments that the fight scene went on a bit long, and there were a few too many nameless meatshields.

robot-god

Afterwards, we scooted off to the pub for a spot of libation and a chinwag.

Remember, we are currently accepting submissions for our next anthology REVOLUTIONS 2, so get writing and get submitting people!

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Tuesday 27th September 2016

Another top meeting to round off September. We had 7 members in attendance with 3 pieces to crit in the drobox (two from new members, good job guys!)

Eric presented part 12 of his novel Hellbound. Everyone was agreed that this was a very easy read with some top writing. There was a great deal of praise for Diane’s character with members enjoying her characterization (and that she is finally breaking free!). Her troubles were very believable. Some questions raised over whether some of this chapter and the previous one with Kim could be condensed into one. Calls to not draw too much attention to Oscar’s powers and to stretch out Diane’s character transition a little more over the preceding chapters

Tom presented the first chapter of his novel The Pilgrim’s Storm. It was clear that there was a very large and interesting world behind this and members really enjoyed the interesting nautical/spacefare crossover, the tension between the alien races, and the bad-ass bat monster that is Heryst! Some questions over whether we perhaps need a more relatable human-like character to get us into the story. Also, how big is a Jarsen? And is this is a prologue (boo! hiss!) do we really need so much of Alius’ backstory? Calls for a little more clarity over the species we encounter and for us to see these characters again soon! (Gief moar Heryst!)

Finally, Bryn presented the first part to a two part short story called An End to Forever. A lot of members felt this was reminiscent of Ian Banks and all enjoyed the poetic themes and the imagery (Superman approves your ice palace!). Some questions over whether we need the initial ‘prologue’ section and whether it wouldn’t be better to drip feed this throughout the story. Also, questions raised about whether the strong poetic element of this piece could be turned into a standalone piece of flash (no prizes for guessing who said this!). Calls for a little less info-dumping and a bit more characterization of our POV character: what does an eternal ice overlord look like?

That’s all for now. Our next meeting is Wednesday the 12th. See you then!

Pip pip.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Wednesday Meeting: 14th September

With a healthy turnout of members, we only had time to get through three of the four submitted pieces this week. But hey ho, what we lacked in crit quantity we made up for in crit quality.

We’d also like to offer a hearty welcome to Tom and Bryn who joined us for the first time. We look forward to reading something from you both in the future.

img_0784

Chris:

Chris presented the first part of a novel called Knight of Never Rest.

Everyone loved the atmospherics in this piece and felt like the idea of a world with naturalised necromancy was quite unique. There were lots of comparisons to The Witcher and Dark Souls. Some felt there was so much going on that they were left with too many unanswered questions. Could the world building be spread out amongst other chapters? Others disagreed with this and were happy to read on in ignorance until more details get revealed.

Some members felt that there was an incongruence between the post-technological, far future society and the extremely archaic language. Would language devolve this way? Some  notable precedents were mentioned, particularly Gene Wolfe’s Book Of The New Sun. Some commented that the protags internal voice was very different from the more archaic dialogue she used. Stylistics aside, I think everyone thought the dialogue seemed natural and engaging.

Everyone is eager to read the second instalment.

knight-of-never-rest

Bronwin:

Bronwin presented a chapter from her novel Green.

As usual, I think everyone found the imagery very satisfying, especially the first couple of pages.

There are still calls for more clarity, with a few members not really knowing where the story is heading. There were even a few questions raised over the necessity of the chapter.

The multiple Reginas scenario was a real source of confusion for many. Is it important to the story? Calls to have just one Regina. Some felt the father was a bit unbelievable. He is awful to his daughter then seems to change his mind for no reason. There were Some calls for the author to do away with the father’s current approach to his daughter’s mutism. Either that or the father’s treatment of his daughter should lead to a lasting rift in the family.

Some members felt Sally was crowbarred in at the end. Could she be introduced earlier?

Everyone is looking forward to the next Chapter!

triple-regina

TRIPLE REGINA!

Melissa:

Melissa presented a short story called A Short History Of Foole

There were lots of positive comments about the humour in this piece, with particular praise for the surrealness. There was healthy discussion over the meaning of the piece. Some members felt that the piece was a fairy tale missing a moral whereas others had their own idea about what the moral might be.

I think everyone found the piece to be very heavy on the telling, and there were calls for a more shown approach to the overall arc. Some members felt that the piece lacked well fleshed out characters,  and struggled to emotionally resonate with the reader. This was a symptom of the strong omniscient viewpoint. There were a few calls for the story to be retold from a third person omniscient perspective.

Telling aside, I think everyone really enjoyed some of the imagery in the piece, which for the most part hit the nail on the head.

Everyone is hoping to read more from Melissa in the future!

village-idiot

 

After the meeting, we all headed over to Common to snarf down some pale ale. The main topic of conversation was James’ recent foray into writing copy for the Brexit biscuit (You think I’m kidding?)

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Tuesday Meeting 23rd August 2016

IMAG3133

 

Last night several of us once again endured high temperatures to attend the Tuesday meeting. No doubt the sunshine contributed to the slight reduction in our usual numbers! Also, a warm welcome to Melissa, who attended her first meeting last night. We look forward to reading her fiction soon!

On with the critiques:

 

mars

“Matt…Damon!”

 

Kate presented the first chapter of an untitled YA sci-fi novel set on Mars.

Everybody liked the great detailed descriptions and the Martian setting (seriously, who doesn’t like Mars?) There was praise for the funny moments in the story and the character of “Magic”, the cut-price Martian tour operator. However, some felt that the secondary characters of Minty and Sapphire were introduced too early. Also, the protagonist’s brother is yet to come across as a character in his own right. But people liked the murder mystery plot and the double (!) cliffhanger ending of this first chapter.

 

funny-redneck-spaceship

 

Peter submitted a short story titled “Mid-Space”.

People praised the nice writing of this piece. The protagonist’s conversation with his incompetent ship’s A.I. was generally thought to be very funny. Some logic questions: exactly how fast is light speed? Would Apple computers exist in the far future? Would a futuristic A.I. really be that incompetent? Some calls to raise the stakes and to turn the “down ending” into an “up ending”. But there was universal praise for the theme and that by the end of the story Duncan just wants to be friends with his A.I. Awww.

 

zombies

 

Rob submitted the first chapter of his fantasy novel, “Necropolis”.

Everybody liked this piece. There was universal praise for the idea of mixing zombies with fantasy. Defoe and Romanitas were alluded to. Some minor anachronisms were pointed out. People also had mixed emotions toward the protagonist. Some felt she was too mean and unsympathetic. Others felt that she was interesting enough and that she will (hopefully) grow as the story continues. Some also liked the reversal of gender expectations. There was a little less enthusiasm for Heimel, who was felt to be a much weaker character. Everyone praised the horrible, bleak setting. Although maybe being based in Manchester had something to do with that!

 

Finally, Eric submitted three short flash fiction pieces.

People thought the “Eyes of Hera” was funny, but the punchline was a bit too convoluted and difficult to grasp. Some difference of opinion over felt the one-sided conversation of the narrator. Some suggested the writer go full-on Tweedpunk.  More people liked “Little Green Men” and the really mean last line ! Finally, “How the Ghost of You Clings” got the most praise, although some wanted more backstory for the protagonist, and there were calls to drop the line “Inconceivable” with its callbacks to The Princess Bride. Fair enough.

 

inconceivable

 

Afterwards we all went to Common, which was unusually quiet (until we got there) and talked about Literary Festivals, Finland, fistfights and, of course, our upcoming anthology!

Next meeting: Wednesday 14th September. So, thanks to the quirkiness of our calendar, there’s plenty of time to get your subs in!

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized